Editorial Policy

Our Research Process

Every Story and Review published on WellnessWire Daily begins with a question a reader is actually asking, then works backward through peer-reviewed research to answer it honestly — including when the honest answer is "the evidence is limited."

Source Selection

We prioritize peer-reviewed studies, systematic reviews, and guidance from recognized health institutions (such as the National Institute on Aging) over press releases, marketing material, or single small studies presented as settled science.

Fact Checking

Every piece is reviewed by a member of our Medical Review Board before publication. Reviewers check both the accuracy of claims and whether the evidence classification assigned (Strong, Moderate, Emerging, Limited, or Insufficient) is fair.

Content Updates

Health research evolves. When new evidence meaningfully changes a Story or Review's conclusions, we update the piece and note the revision date rather than leaving outdated claims live indefinitely.

Corrections

If you believe something we've published is inaccurate, please contact us. We take corrections seriously and will review and, where warranted, update the piece promptly.

Editorial Independence

Our editorial team's evaluations are not influenced by whether a product is part of an affiliate partnership. A product with a strong evidence base and a product with a weak one are described accordingly, regardless of whether we earn a commission from either.